Sputtr.com | Alternative Search Engine

Respondents

Matter of E-R-M-F- & A-S-M-, Respondents

Cite as 25 I&N Dec. 580 (BIA 2011) Interim Decision #3725 580 Matter of E-R-M-F- & A-S-M-, Respondents Decided August 11, 2011 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Until an alien who is arrested without a warrant is placed in formal ...

Respondents’ Understandings of Confidentiality in a ...

Respondents' Understandings of Confidentiality in a Changing Privacy Environment Respondents’ Understandings of Confidentiality in a Changing Privacy Environment

What's Work? Respondents' Interpretations of Work-Related ...

1 FINAL REPORT What's Work? Respondents' Interpretations of Work-Related Summary Questions Lisa K. Schwartz The American Time Use Survey Bureau of Labor Statistics Siri Lynn The Idea Exchange Jayme Gortman The American Time Use Survey Bureau of Labor Statistics October 2001

Survey Respondents

For more details and attributes: 800.310.6838 or samplesales@zoomerang.com 3 Zoomerang ™ Panel Profile Reference Book Reach More Than 2 Million Survey-takers Much More Than a List of People Zoomerang Sample ™ offers you much more than a rented list of random people.

Respondents' Answers and Objections to Complaint Counsel's ...

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERA TRAE COMMISSION OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUGES In the matter of Docket No. 9315 (Public Record Version) Evanston Northwestern Healthcare Corporation, a corporation, and ENH Medical Group, Inc., a corporation.

DECISION AND ORDER - STATE OF MICHIGAN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS ...

STATE OF MICHIGAN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION LABOR RELATIONS DIVISION In the Matter of: LAKE COUNTY AND LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF, Public Employers - Respondents,

Respondents' Response to Order to Show Cause [Amended Version]

obligation to certify Respondents ' request for relief to the Commission, flows from Complaint Counsel' s violation of federal law and breach of the Court Protective Order not from the natue of the information unlawflly disclosed by the Commission to the public.

RESPONDENTS' ANSWERING BRIEF

•I. INTRODUCTION Appellants' sole cause of action is for negligence. To establish that Respondents owed a duty of care to Appellants (which is a prerequisite for a negligence claim), Appellants ask this Court to adopt the "emergency doctrine."

RESPONDENTS' BRIEF

I. SUMMARY Contrary to Appellant Bellingham BSC's story, there never was any genuine issue of material fact that Section 3 of the Fourth Amendment to the Lease -as drafted by the Landlord (Appellant's BSC direct predecessor) -ambiguously provided that (1) Respondent ARC (the Lessee) was entitled ...

AFFIRMED - GEORGE BROWN, JR., ) ) Appellant, ) ) vs. ) No ...

GEORGE BROWN, JR., ) ) Appellant, ) ) vs. ) No. SD30659 ) BOB SIMMONS, DANNY DODSON, ) JANET THOMAS and ROB SHARP, ) ) Respondents.