Sputtr.com | Alternative Search Engine

Unanimous

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

KAGAN, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. _____ _____ Cite as: 565 U. S. ____ (2011) 1 Opinion of the Court . NOTICE: This opinion is ...

United States Court of Appeals

2 Shannon E. German was on the brief for amicus curiae State of Delaware in support of petitioners. Randall W. Quinn, Assistant General Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission, argued the cause for respondent.

A Study of Unanimity on the Court:

A Study of Unanimity on the Court: Can we assume the Supreme Court wants unanimous decisions? Jennifer E. Nicoll Washington University in St. Louis Department of Political Science This paper examines the merit of assuming the Supreme Court desires and tries to maintain unanimous decisions.

Unanimous  Decisions  in  the  Supreme ...

Revised June 19, 2011 Unanimous Decisions in the Supreme Court 1 Lee Epstein William M. Landes Richard A. Posner The Supreme Court is widely regarded, and not only by ...

Question Sheet for the Declaration Activity (with answers)

1 Question Sheet for the Declaration Activity (with answers) 1. Jefferson chose to begin the Declaration with the words, "The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America."

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON MATHEW and STEPHANIE McCLEARY, on their own behalf and on behalf of KELSEY and CARTER McCLEARY, their two children in

APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DECEMBER 6, 2011 JOHN LEY CLERK ...

filed u.s. court of appeals eleventh circuit december 6, 2011 john ley clerk [publish] in the united states court of appeals for the eleventh circuit _____ no. 10-14833 ; 10-15015 _____ d.c. docket no. 1:08-cv-02360-rws vandiver elizabeth glenn, f.k ...

State ex rel. Ohioans for Fair Dists. v. Husted

[Cite as State ex rel. Ohioans for Fair Dists. v. Husted, 130 Ohio St.3d 240, 2011-Ohio-5333.] THE STATE EX REL. OHIOANS FOR FAIR DISTRICTS ET AL. v. HUSTED,

Unanimous-consent Agreements

861 Unanimous-consent Agreements §1. In General; Effect of Agreement §2. Recognition of Members for Requests §3. Timeliness §4. Stating the Request; Withdrawal §5.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

COUNSEL ARGUED: Neal Kumar Katyal, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Earle Duncan Getchell, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.